Institute of Sociology
of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Yakimets V. N., Nikovskaya L.I., Chigrin V.A., Uzunov V.V. The state of institutions and subjects of municipal public policy in Simferopol: features and ways of improvement (based on the results of a sociological study). In: Social transformations in the context of spatial development of Russia. Materials of the Second Crimean Sociological Forum (Rostov-on-Don-Simferopol, September 28-29, 2020) ...



Yakimets V. N., Nikovskaya L.I., Chigrin V.A., Uzunov V.V. The state of institutions and subjects of municipal public policy in Simferopol: features and ways of improvement (based on the results of a sociological study). In: Social transformations in the context of spatial development of Russia. Materials of the Second Crimean Sociological Forum (Rostov-on-Don-Simferopol, September 28-29, 2020) / Ed. by Yu.G. Volkov, V. V. Uzunov, V. A. Chigrin. - Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House Foundation of Science and Education, 2020. P. 672-688.
ISBN 978-5-907361-35-5
DOI нет
РИНЦ: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44747422&pff=1

Posted on site: 22.03.21

 


Abstract

The paper describes the methodology and organization of a targeted survey of representatives of four groups of respondents (municipal authorities, employees of municipal unitary enterprises (hereinafter referred to as CBMs), small and medium-sized businesses, and the non-profit sector), conducted to study the features of the state of institutions and mechanisms of municipal public policy (hereinafter referred to as MPP) in the Simferopol municipality (hereinafter referred to as MO). The method of calculating the integral index of municipal public policy is briefly described. The criteria for assessing the viability of the institutions and mechanisms of the WFP and the completeness of the subject functionality of the actors and subjects of the WFP are described. It is shown that in Simferopol, business representatives ' assessments of the activities of the institutions and subjects of the MPP are significantly lower than those of the authorities, NGOs and employees of the MPP. Some dysfunctions in the field of public interaction between the municipal government, the non-profit community and small businesses are revealed. Incomplete use of opportunities of intersectoral social partnership at the city level is noted. The need to strengthen the dialogue of the authorities with representatives of the local community, to promote new technologies of interaction, including digital ones, was noted.