Institute of Sociology
of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Fabrykant M, Magun V. Contrasting perspectives: Belief in national superiority in relation to countries’ performance. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. August 2022. doi: 10.1177 ...



Fabrykant M, Magun V. Contrasting perspectives: Belief in national superiority in relation to countries’ performance. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. August 2022. doi: 10.1177/00207152221115631
ISSN 0020-7152 (print); ISSN 1745-2554 (online)
DOI 10.1177/00207152221115631
ÐÈÍÖ: https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=49817612

Posted on site: 25.08.22

Òåêñò ñòàòüè íà ñàéòå researchgate.net URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362556784_Contrasting_perspectives_Belief_in_national_superiority_in_relation_to_countries%27_performance


Abstract

This article examines cross-country differences in the strength of individuals’ belief that their country is better than most others and the dependence of this belief on their country’s performance in various spheres. The research design consists of a series of multilevel ordinal logistic regression models estimated using the data of the most recent thematic wave of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP)—National Identity module. Our research finds that these effects are mostly nonlinear U-shaped: people from both high- and low-performing countries express a strong belief in their country’s superiority, while people from averageperforming countries do not. These findings suggest a bifurcated nature of belief in national superiority—an interplay between a grounded estimation of a country’s actual achievements and the social norms and individual motivations that prescribe holding one’s own country in high esteem regardless of its actual performance. These norms are found to be the strongest in underperforming countries, while in average- and high-performing countries, people making these evaluations are under weaker normative pressure and therefore more attuned to country achievements. As a result, the weakest belief in national superiority is found not in underperforming, but in average-performing countries. The latter also have the highest diversity on this belief, probably because different segments of the population compare their country’s performance against different benchmarks. This article examines cross-country differences in the strength of individuals’ belief that their country is betterthan most others and the dependence of this belief on their country’s performance in various spheres. Theresearch design consists of a series of multilevel ordinal logistic regression models estimated using the dataof the most recent thematic wave of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP)—National Identitymodule. Our research finds that these effects are mostly nonlinear U-shaped: people from both high- andlow-performing countries express a strong belief in their country’s superiority, while people from averageperformingcountries do not. These findings suggest a bifurcated nature of belief in national superiority—aninterplay between a grounded estimation of a country’s actual achievements and the social norms and individualmotivations that prescribe holding one’s own country in high esteem regardless of its actual performance.These norms are found to be the strongest in underperforming countries, while in average- and high-performingcountries, people making these evaluations are under weaker normative pressure and therefore more attunedto country achievements. As a result, the weakest belief in national superiority is found not in underperforming,but in average-performing countries. The latter also have the highest diversity on this belief, probably because different segments of the population compare their country’s performance against different benchmarks.

Àâòîðû:

Ôàáðèêàíò Ì.Ñ., Ìàãóí Â.Ñ.