Institute of Sociology
of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Rusanova N.E. (2022) Reproductive birth control after the coronavirus pandemic. Population and Economics 6(4): 178-188. https:



Rusanova N.E. (2022) Reproductive birth control after the coronavirus pandemic. Population and Economics 6(4): 178-188. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.6.e90355
ISSN 2658-3798
DOI 10.3897/popecon.6.e90355

Posted on site: 13.01.23

Текст статьи на сайте журнала URL: https://populationandeconomics.pensoft.net/article/90355/list/9/ (дата обращения 13.01.2023)


Abstract

Changes in measures and instruments of birth control are one of the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic in all countries with increased significance of reproductive components, i.e. concerning physiological capabilities of conception, gestation and childbirth. Pandemic-associated measures had diverse impacts on restrictive (aimed at reducing fertility) and expansionary (aimed at increasing fertility) methods of reproductive regulation: it did not take methods of pregnancy prevention and artificial termination of pregnancy long to adapt to the new conditions without changing the established trends, while assisted reproductive technologies, following administrative bans of the first days of mass lockdowns, demonstrated new development directions upon removal of bans. Against the background of the progress in the medical component, increasingly bringing in- vitro fertilization closer to natural conception, the scale of state funding and the number of free of charge programs for patients have increased, however, due to anti-epidemic control, cross-border reproductive care or fertility tourism, relevant for surrogacy and reproductive donation, has become more complicated. In Russia, this has intensified public discussions and contributed to further elaboration of reproductive legislation.

Авторы: