Chernova Z. V. (2023) Methodological Aspects of Expert Interviews: Approaches, Opportunities, and Limitations. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 5. P. 74–90. https: ... Chernova Z. V. (2023) Methodological Aspects of Expert Interviews: Approaches, Opportunities, and Limitations. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 5. P. 74–90. https:// doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.5.2418. (In Russ.)ISSN 2219-5467DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2023.5.2418РИНЦ: https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=54931877Posted on site: 15.12.23Текст статьи на сайте журнала URL: https://www.monitoringjournal.ru/index.php/monitoring/article/view/2418/1833 (дата обращения 15.12.2023)AbstractThe article focuses on the methodological features of expert inter views, which are considered as a substantive method of qualitative research Its purpose is to draw attention to the specifics of using this tool for collecting empirical data in social research. The popularity of this research method, especially when conducting applied research, is associated with its versatility in providing access to both ‘objective’ facts and uncodified knowledge, as well as the in formant’s individual opinion and experience. The author of this article discusses methodological issues related to inter viewing experts in an administrative con text. This format of organizing and conducting interviews with experts ex officio in a situation of high organizational accountability imposes certain features both on the very procedure of using the method and on the subsequent analytical work of the researcher. The article introduces the concept of an expert interview and draws its differences from elite and ordinary interviews. Then the author presents established approaches to categorizing expert inter views (exploratory, interpretative, systematic, and problem-oriented) based on the type of expert knowledge acquired (technical, process, and interpretive). Following that, the author demonstrates how expert interviews can be used at various stages of the research cycle. Particular attention is paid to three characteristic difficulties that a researcher encounters during the preparation and conduct of an interview with an expert (i.e., features of interaction between the interviewer and the informant that should be taken into account when developing a research design). The conclusion summarizes the advantages and limitations of this method of collecting empirical data. Content (in russ)hide table of contentsshow table of contents