Chernozub O.L., Shuraeva L.Y. Orthogonality of IAT and GATA Results: The Worse, the Bet-ter? Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2023. No. 6. P. 218–237.

Òåêñò ñòàòüè íà ñàéòå æóðíàëà URL: https://www.monitoringjournal.ru/index.php/monitoring/article/view/2478 (äàòà îáðàùåíèÿ 07.01.2024)

Abstract

In the previous article “Comparative  Analysis  of  Implicit  GATA  and  IAT Measures: Unity in Diversity” (No. 5 / 2023 of the journal “Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes”), the authors presented a rationale for theoretical relevance and described in detail the tools of the methodological experiment on assessing the convergent validity of the two methods for measuring implicit factors of social action, Graphical Association Test of Attitude (GATA) and Implicit Association Test (IAT). This study elaborates this work and is aimed, firstly, at checking the reproducibility of previously identified differences between the measurement results of these two methods, and secondly, at studying the connection of the detected differences with the characteristics of the GATA and its validity. The results show that differences in test scores are reproducible, but are explained not by “bad” but by “good” GATO  performance:  the  authors  show  that  GATO  scores  that  are  more  inadequate in terms of internal validity are associated with greater similarity between them and IAT scores.

Content (in russ)