Merzlykov A.A. (2024) Social Dialogue as an Instrument of Institutional Governance in Social Development. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 4, pp.99-113. DOI: 10.30727 ...

Abstract

The article discusses the role of social dialogue in Russia as an instrument of institutional governance in social development. The author analyzes the distinctive features of social dialogue as a unique social institution with transformative potential for overcoming societal fragmentation and polarization. The search for adequate forms of social participation becomes particularly acute in light of the growing threat of sociocultural divisions between modernization-oriented and traditionalist analytical frameworks of social development. The study explores two main aspects of the functioning of social dialogue: its role in securing public support for governmental programs and in forming effective mechanisms for social participation within the system of relations between the federal center and the regions. Social dialogue in the “center – regions” system emerges when the negotiation process involves not only governmental (authority) structures but also public representatives. Citizen participation in negotiations represents a specific form of self-determination by population segments either supporting or opposing particular joint project between the center and the region. The absence of comprehensive social dialogue may lead to significant challenges in implementing state programs, while its proper organization enhances their effectiveness. The author provides an example of unifying mechanisms for implementing the principle of social participation through the formation of a poly-subject interaction environment and the “assembly of subjects” (V.E. Lepsky’s term) in regional development. The article concludes that the institutionalization of social dialogue facilitates the transfer of certain rights and resources from the center to the regions in managing socio-economic processes, promotes the development of flexibility and adaptability in dialogical practices while simultaneously abandoning the rigid command-administrative management model, and strengthens partnership interactions among participants in social development.