Patrushev S.V., Marinosyan A.K., Ostrovskaya J.E., & Filippova L.E. (2024) Understanding Social Dialogue: Typology of Approaches and Problems of Conceptualization. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 72–98. DOI: 10.30727 ...

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of conceptualizing social dialogue as both a mechanism of interaction among various social actors and as an instrument of social development. While social dialogue was initially associated with labor relations, contemporary social changes necessitate expanding its scope and institutionalization. The paper presents the philosophical foundations of dialogue, which establish the groundwork for understanding it as a means of achieving mutual understanding and creating new meanings. Organizational dialogue theories offer specific strategies and methodologies for conducting effective dialogue. The authors also explore deliberative governance and deliberative democracy approaches, enabling the comprehension of dialogue within a broader political and social context. Analysis of key conceptualization issues in social dialogue requires defining its participants, objectives, subject matter, and conditions for effectiveness. Various types of social dialogue are identified and analyzed, including transformational, consensus-based, cognitive-innovative, and monitoring dialogues. Each type is examined in terms of its potential and limitations in addressing different social challenges. The article also raises questions about the boundaries of the applicability of dialogical approaches and their relationship with other forms of social interaction and governance. The authors discuss the demarcation between the realm of social dialogue and administrative management, as well as the integration of dialogical processes into existing managerial structures. Issues regarding the role of the state in social dialogue and the balance between formal and informal dialogue mechanisms are also considered. In conclusion, the article emphasizes the need for an interdisciplinary approach to the study of social dialogue, arguing that it can serve as a powerful tool for bridging the gap between individual aspirations and collective interests, thereby fostering socio-individual convergence.