Gavrilyuk T. & Bocharov V. (2018). Intersectionality as a Way of Conceptualizing Gender and Class Inequality. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 16(3), 537-545.

Текст статьи на сайте журнала URL: https://jsps.hse.ru/article/view/8035/8738 (дата обращения 06.11.2018)

Abstract

This article offers an analytical review of the theoretical and social assumptions, as well as methodological approaches, behind the theory of class and gender inequality interpretation. As two basic concepts of modern sociology, gender and class have produced two parallel scientific discourses for a long time. On the one hand, the conventional class analysis was gender-insensitive, protecting its own initial assumptions under the onslaught of feminist criticism, until the mid‑1980s. On the other hand, gender theory and women’s studies often ignored the difference significance generated by social origin and class habitus. Postmodern criticism of the 1990s, and the 'cultural turn' this engendered, called into question the relevance of these categories by emphasizing their socially constructed nature, as well their inherent instability and fragmentation. At the same time, the consequences of global capitalist transformation, which affected large social groups, demonstrated the conceptual inadequacy of the constructivist approach to the categories in question. One of the answers to the postmodernism challenge is the theory of intersectionality, which takes into account both the influence of discourse producing social differences and barriers and actually existing power dispositions. This This article offers an analytical review of the theoretical and social assumptions,as well as methodological approaches, behind the theory of class andgender inequality interpretation. As two basic concepts of modern sociology,gender and class have produced two parallel scientific discourses for a longtime. On the one hand, the conventional class analysis was gender-insensitive,protecting its own initial assumptions under the onslaught of feminist criticism,until the mid‑1980s. On the other hand, gender theory and women’sstudies often ignored the difference significance generated by social originand class habitus. Postmodern criticism of the 1990s, and the 'cultural turn'this engendered, called into question the relevance of these categories byemphasizing their socially constructed nature, as well their inherent instabilityand fragmentation. At the same time, the consequences of global capitalisttransformation, which affected large social groups, demonstrated the conceptualinadequacy of the constructivist approach to the categories in question.One of the answers to the postmodernism challenge is the theory of intersectionality,which takes into account both the influence of discourse producingsocial differences and barriers and actually existing power dispositions. This methodological framework studies how socially constructed and historically rooted systems of power and domination influence the formation of individual subjectivity. It is postulated and justified in the intersectional approach that the mutual imposition of several stigmatizing social categorizations generates multiple negative effects for discriminated groups. The article presents an overview of international research by means of intersectional ‘optics’, examining different versions of gender and sexual normality production, as well as strategies for combining family and professional roles within the framework of class cultures.

Content (in russ)