Mansurov V.A.,Yurchenko O.V. The Fall of School Teachers’ Authority. In: Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities. View from Russia [Electronic resource]: collected papers XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology «Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities» (Toronto, Canada, July 15-21, 2018) ... Mansurov V.A.,Yurchenko O.V. The Fall of School Teachers’ Authority. In: Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities. View from Russia [Electronic resource]: collected papers XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology «Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities» (Toronto, Canada, July 15-21, 2018) / Editor-in-Chief V. Mansurov. Moscow: RSS; FCTAS RAS. 2018. – 441 p. P. 122-131. 1 ÑD ROM; 12 sm – system requirements: Windows XP/Vista/7/10 – Title from disk label.Ãëàâà èç êíèãè: Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities. View from Russia [Electronic resource]: collected papers XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology «Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities» ( Toronto, Canada, July 15-21, 2018) / Editor-in-Chief V. Mansurov. Moscow: RSS; FCTAS RAS. 2018. – 441 p. 1 ÑD ROM; 12 sm – system requirements: Windows XP/Vista/7/10 – Title from disk label.ISBN 978-5904804-24-4Posted on site: 10.12.18 AbstractEducational occupations in Russia have been, and remain, subordinate to the state and have only been subject to market forces at the margins. In this article, we shall consider the changing nature of school teachers’ professional knowledge and authority. We undertook a qualitative research (6 focus-group groups – 57 school teachers) in public Moscow region schools. A new policy of the Ministry of Education and Science fostered changes of school education. It proclaimed the need to change the content of the school teachers’ job and to build an open and collegial management system in school education. The introduction of these new school standards resulted in the increased workload of school teachers, who were burdened with bureaucratic responsibilities. Even the record-keeping of teachers doubled. They were required to keep an electronic record of pupils’ performance in addition to the hand-written records. The school teachers argued that state policymakers’ detailed control over this professional work grew, as did that of the parents who made higher demands of school education. The professional community was discontented with the implications of diminished discretion and with the fall of authority. There was no much freedom of choice regarding learning programmes, textbooks and working routine. The population survey showed that only 39% of adults were ready to acknowledge the authority of school teachers. Schoolchildren challenged the authority of school teachers too. Even primary school children were aware of the various ways to acquire knowledge (Google, Wikipedia, YouTube, etc.). They did not need teachers as a source of knowledge in the same way as pupils did a few years ago. Teachers could not derive their authority just from their position and knowledge. The most desirable type of authority was personal authority, based upon merit and respect.Àâòîðû:Ìàíñóðîâ Â.À., Þð÷åíêî Î.Â.