Fomin M.V., Bezverbny V.A., Seleznev I.A., Shushpanova I.S., Lukashenko E.A., Miriazov T.R. Regions spatial development problems of the Russian Far East North: sociological analysis. Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2020, 66 (2): 217–233. [In Russian].

Текст статьи на сайте журнала URL: https://www.aaresearch.science/jour/article/view/258 (дата обращения 14.07.2020)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify the features and problems of spatial development of the regions of theNorth of the Russian Far East. The research was carried out under the project “Modeling the spatial developmentscenarios of Siberia and the Far East of Russia until 2030: features of the resettlement system” (RFBR grant No.19-010-00836 A), which won the RFBR competition “Fundamental Scientific Research Projects”. The study isbeing conducted by the team of the Department of Geourbanistics & Spatial Development of ISPR FCTAS RASsince 2019 and is intended to last for three years. The main goal is to assess the current state of the resettlementsystem, develop strategic prospects and model alternative scenarios for the spatial development of the regionsof the Siberian and Far Eastern Federal Districts. A key feature is the use of interdisciplinary methods based ona combination of economic, mathematical, sociological, statistical and scenario approaches to research. Froma practical point of view, the project results will help to plan more rationally the spatial development the spatialdevelopment of the country’s regions. The analysis shows that the sociological methods of spatial research havelarge reserves but are not yet used to the full capacity. This article discusses the current problems of spatialdevelopment of the north of the Russian Far East. On the basis of the authors’ development of the empiricalresearch model by a group of scientists of ISPR FCTAS RAS, in August 2019, the survey of respondents of theKamchatka Krai, the Magadan Oblast` and the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug was conducted. The results of theopinion poll made it possible to identify differences in migration preferences, a number of features of the economicpotential capacity and the quality of infrastructure, and the social sphere of the Far Eastern regions of the country.