Cherednichenko G. Educational and Career Trajectories of Extramural Students and Graduates of Higher Education. Educational Studies Moscow, 2020, No 3, pp. 165-187. Cherednichenko G. Educational and Career Trajectories of Extramural Students and Graduates of Higher Education. Educational Studies Moscow, 2020, No 3, pp. 165-187.ISSN 1814-9545DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-3-165-187РИНЦ: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44007513Posted on site: 21.10.20Текст статьи на сайте журнала URL: https://vo.hse.ru/2020--3/399700637.html (дата обращения 21.10.2020)AbstractThe results of a 2019 sociological survey conducted on a nationwide structured sample of extramural students (2019) and graduates (20002018) of Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) are used to construct the social portrait of extramural students and graduates and identify the types of their educational strategies as well as the motives that led them to extramural studies. We compare the expected and experienced effects of education on graduates' positions in the labor market and analyze their movements within the socio-occupational hierarchy as a result of obtaining that education. Extramural students differ from full-timers in that they feature a more democratic socioeconomic composition, possess a different amount of educational resources at the enrollment stage, and have specific needs, the most important one being that of entering the labor market and/or compensating for one's reduced competitiveness. A large proportion of extramural students already have a vocational school diploma, which reflects the growing popularity of the bypass strategy to access higher education among certain social groups, which allows them to slip past the obligatory high-stakes testing. Educational capital of HEIs candidates (corresponding to four types of educational trajectories of extramural students) correlates with their socioeconomic backgrounds. The advantages and disadvantages of educational background at baseline extend into the next stage of education. Similarly, differences in social and occupational status at entry further translate into different degrees of success in converting qualifications into degree-matching statuses